Frink, graduated from Florida State University, B.S., 1997 University of Florida, J.D., 2000, is now employed by Beckham & Beckham, P.A.NOTE: **To use a touch-tone phone/Dial by location use one of the following number followed by the division Judge’s unique meeting ID: at 1550 Northeast Miami Gardens Drive, Suite 504 Miami, FL 33179. 521 S ANDREWS AVE FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 Get Directions (954) 318-1374. While being a member of American Bar Association (Member, Sections on: Litigation TIPS)., Keathan B. Founded 2006 Incorporated Annual Revenue -Employee Count 0 Industries Nonclassifiable Establishments Contacts Contact Business. Frink is one of the more than one million lawyers in United States. Frink as your lawyer, you should consider whether Keathan B. A former assistant public defender who joined Florida's 17th Judicial Circuit in 2016, Judge Keathan B. Frink offers free consultation, (if not) how much the initial interview costs, if there is any hidden attorney fees, what's the fee schedule, whether he or she has good community reputation and is able to provide a list of good references. Frink is currently overseeing a complaint seeking damages on claims for assault and battery against Tampa Bay Buccaneers wide receiver Antonio Brown and his trainer Glenn Holt. Here, Law360 Pulse looks at Judge Frink's path to the bench and some of his biggest moments as a jurist. You can also contact the Board of Professional Responsibility of the state bar, to find out if Keathan B. Frink has ever been placed under any disciplinary actions. Frink's office is located at Miami, FL, he or she might belong to the bar association of other states. You should also ask how long the lawyer has been in practice, how much experience he or she has in cases like yours, and more importantly, the outcomes of those cases! Focus of the lawyer's practice and years of experience are also very important factors in your evaluation process. The more focused the lawyer's practice areas, the better service he or she could provide. So do not make decisions solely on one or two factors. The Find a Lawyer directory is provided as a public service. Only hire lawyers you feel comfortable with as they will represent you and your interests, and you will be sharing private details about your life with them. The Florida Bar maintains limited basic information about lawyers licensed. Frink has been admitted in 2000, Florida 2002, District of Columbia 2006, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida. frink trialįrink's college education includes Florida State University, B.S., 1997, law school degree was from University of Florida, J.D., 2000, other biographical background includes Member, Executive Board, Trial Team. You should contact other lawyers and law firms nearby before choosing your legal representatives. If you are the owner or employee of Beckham & Beckham, P.A., and want to update the information, please create a new account and then Claim & Edit Beckham & Beckham, P.A. If you want to add your attorney firm, please create a new account.Order Order on Motion for Reconsideration Overview Donations Expenditures Loans Personal Activity Current State Profile Office Held. PAPERLESS ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motions for Rehearing and Reconsideration ("Motions"). On September 10, 2021, the Court entered an Order Dismissing Plaintiff's Pro Se Complaint. On October 8, 2021, Plaintiff filed two slightly different Motions for Rehearing and Reconsideration. View phone numbers, addresses, public records, background check reports and possible arrest records for Keathan Frink in Florida (FL). The "purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence." Arthur v. The moving party "must demonstrate why the court should reconsider its prior decision and set forth facts or law of a strongly convincing nature to induce the Court to reverse its prior decision." U.S. 2011) (citations omitted) see also Slomcenski v. Courts generally grant motions for reconsideration when there is "(1) an intervening change in controlling law, (2) the availability of new evidence, and (3) the need to correct clear error or manifest injustice." Sanzone v. Here, applying the foregoing standards and having carefully reviewed the record, Plaintiff does not provide any viable grounds for reconsideration.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |